Squeezing the most efficient performance
from your web pages is important. The benefits are universal,
whether the site is personal or large and professional.
Reducing page weight can speed up the browsing experience,
especially if your visitors are using dial-up internet
access. Though broadband access is the future, the present
still contains a great deal of dial-up users. Many sites,
ecommerce sites especially, cannot afford to ignore
this large section of the market. Sites with a large
amount of unique traffic may also save on their total
monthly traffic by slimming down their web pages. This
article will cover the basics of on-page optimization
in both text/code and graphics.
Graphics
Graphics are the usual suspect on heavy pages. Either
as a result of a highly graphic design, or a few poorly
optimized images, graphics can significantly extend
the load-time of a web page. The first step in graphics
optimization is very basic. Decide if the graphics are
absolutely necessary and simply eliminate or move the
ones that aren't. Removing large graphics from the homepage
to a separate gallery will likely increase the number
of visitors who 'hang around' to let the homepage load.
Separating larger photos or art to a gallery also provides
the opportunity to provide fair warning to users clicking
on the gallery that it may take longer to load. In the
case of graphical buttons, consider the use of text
based, CSS-styled buttons instead. Sites that use a
highly graphic design, a common theme in website 'templates',
need to optimize their graphics as best as possible.
Graphics optimization first involves selecting the appropriate
file type for your image. Though this topic alone is
fodder for far more in depth analysis, I will touch
on it briefly. Images come in 2 basic varieties, those
that are photographic in nature, and those that are
graphic in nature. Photographs have a large array of
colors all jumbled together in what's referred to as
continuous tone. Graphics, such as business logos, are
generally smooth, crisp and have large areas of the
same color. Photographs are best compressed into 'JPEGs'.
The 'Joint Photographic Expert Group' format can successfully
compress large photos down to very manageable sizes.
It is usually applied on a sliding 'quality' scale between
1-100, 1 being the most compressed and lowest quality,
100 the least and highest quality. JPEG is a 'lossy'
compression algorithm, meaning it 'destroys' image information
when applied, so always keep a copy of the original
file. Graphics and logos generally work best in the
'GIF', or more recently, the 'PNG' format. These formats
are more efficient than JPEGs at reducing the size of
images with large areas of similar color, such as logos
or graphical text.
A few general notes on other media are appropriate.
Other types of media such as Flash or sound files also
slow down a page. The first rule is always the same,
consider whether they are absolutely necessary. If you
are choosing to build the site entirely in Flash, then
make sure the individual sections and elements are as
well compressed as possible. In the case of music, I
will admit to personal bias here and paraphrase a brilliant
old saying, 'Websites should be seen and not heard.'
Simply, music playing in the background will not 'enhance'
any browsing experience.
Text and Code
The most weight to be trimmed on a page will come from
graphical and media elements, but it is possible to
shed a few extra bytes by looking at the text and code
of a web page. In terms of actual text content, there
may not be much to do here. A page's content is key
not only to the user's understanding but also search
engine ranking. Removing or better organizing content
is only necessary in extreme situations, where more
than page weight is an issue. An example might be a
long, text heavy web page requiring a lengthy vertical
scrolling to finish. Such a page is common on 'infomercial'
sites, and violates basic design tenants beyond those
related to page weight.
Code is a different story. A website's code can be made
more efficient in a variety of fashions. First, via
the use of CSS, all style elements of a web page can
now be called via an external file. This same file can
be called on all a site's pages, providing for a uniform
look and feel. Not only is this more efficient; it is
also the official recommendation from the W3C. The same
may be said of XHTML and the abandonment of 'table'
based layout. Tables, though effective for layout, produce
more code than equivalent XHTML layouts using 'div'
tags. Where a minimum of 3 tags are required to create
a 'box' with content in a table, only 1 is needed using
divisions. Using XHTML and CSS in combination can significantly
reduce the amount of 'on page' code required by a web
page. A final, relatively insignificant trick is the
removal of all 'white space' from your code. Browsers
don't require it; it is primarily so authors can readily
read and interpret the code. The savings are minimal
at best, but for sites that receive an extreme amount
of traffic, even a few saved bytes will add up over
time.
Conclusions
Target images and media files first when seeking to
reduce the weight of a page. They are the largest components
of overall page weight and simply removing them can
significantly reduce total weight. The images that remain
should be optimally compressed into a format appropriate
for their type, photos or graphics. Avoid huge blocks
of text that cause unnecessary vertical scrolling. Organize
the site more efficiently to spread the information
across multiple pages. Adopt XHTML and CSS to reduce
the size of the on-page code, and call the CSS externally.
These tips should help reduce the size of your pages
and speed their delivery to your viewers.
About The Author: Eric Lester
- worked in the IT industry for 5 years, acquiring knowledge
of hosting, website design, before serving for 4 years
as the webmaster for Apollo Hosting. Apollo Hosting
provides website hosting, ecommerce hosting, vps hosting,
and web design services to a wide range of customers.
|